History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Comer
543 Pa. 391
Pa.
1996
Check Treatment

*392 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to Issues II, III, IV, and V as stated in the Petition:

II. Whether the Court below incorrectly concluded that the conviction of Involuntary Manslaughter was based on insufficient evidence?
III. Whether the Court below incorrectly concluded that the conviction for Aggravated Assault was based on insufficient evidence or contrary to law?
IV. Whether the Court below incorrectly concluded that Petitioner made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to a jury trial under Pa.R.Crim.P. Rule 1101?
V. Whether the Court below incorrectly concluded that Petitioner did not receive multiple punishments for violations of the same offense at one trial in violation of the Double Jeopardy clauses of both the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions?

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Comer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 28, 1996
Citation: 543 Pa. 391
Docket Number: Petition No. 710 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1995
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.