History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Collier
373 A.2d 454
Pa.
1977
Check Treatment

Dissenting Opinion

ROBERTS, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent, Appellant’s statements were admitted in violation of Pa.R.Crim.P. 130; see Commonwealth v. Cherry, 457 Pa. 201, 321 A.2d 611 (1974); Commonwealth v. Futch, 447 Pa. 389, 290 A.2d 417 (1972). I would there*13fore reverse the judgment of sentence and grant appellant a new trial.

MANDERINO, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.





Lead Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

JONES, former C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. ROBERTS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which MANDERINO, J., joins.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Collier
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jun 3, 1977
Citation: 373 A.2d 454
Docket Number: Appeal Nos. 167 and 171
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.