midpage

Commonwealth v. ChaseCommonwealth v. Chase

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Jul 2, 1878
Reporters:
,
Before:
Gray
Gray, C. J.

The word “ confectionery ” is a generic word, which includes a great variety of kinds of articles usually sold in a confectioner’s shop, and does not describe the substance, which the defendant is charged with adulterating, with the precision and certainty that the Constitution of the Commonwealth and the rules of criminal pleading require. Declaration of Eights, art. 12. Commonwealth v. Maxwell, 2 Pick. 139, 143. State v. Morey, 2 Wis. 494. Rex v. Chalkley, Russ. & Ry. 258. Archb. Crim. Pl. (18th ed.) 63. The objection, having been duly taken by motion to quash before the jury were empanelled, is rightly before us on the bill of exceptions. St. 1864, c. 250, § 2. Commonwealth v. McGovern, 10 Allen, 193. The exceptions must therefore be sustained and the Indictment quashed.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Chase
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jul 2, 1878
Citations: 125 Mass. 202; 1878 Mass. LEXIS 43
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In