History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Chase
256 Pa. Super. 514
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 1978
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Judgments of sentence affirmed.






Dissenting Opinion

HOFFMAN, J.,

dissents because he believes that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the guilty verdicts.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Chase
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 5, 1978
Citation: 256 Pa. Super. 514
Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 137 and 138
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.