History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Catlin
1 Mass. 8
Mass.
1804
Check Treatment
The Court

(Strong Sedgwick, Sewall, and Thatcher, justices) were unanimously of opinion, and Strong, J., who charged thejury, stated it as the unanimous opinion of the Court, that although it might be true that the facts proved amounted to an offence, yet that they did not prove the offence charged in the indictment; that the offence charged is open gross lewdness and lascivious behavior, and nothing more: admitting every thing which has been testified to be true, there is certainly nothing more proved than secret or private lewdness and lascivious behavior, which cannot in any degree support the charge in the indictment.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Catlin
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1804
Citation: 1 Mass. 8
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.