History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Cannon
982 A.2d 1218
Pa.
2009
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court override controlling authority establishing that in a joint trial, where the Commonwealth properly redacted a co-defendant’s statement and did not use it to directly establish defendant’s guilt, and where the trial court properly instructed the jury regarding that statement, the narrow exception to the presumption that a jury will follow its instructions established in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), does not apply?

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Cannon
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 20, 2009
Citation: 982 A.2d 1218
Docket Number: Petition No. 302 EAL 2009
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In