History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Cameron
229 Pa. 592
Pa.
1911
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

We concur in the conclusion reached by the Superior Court, that sec. 32, art. Ill, of the constitution is restrictive only of the use of the testimony actually given by a witness under compulsion and that it does not confer immunity from prosecution for an offense in relation to which a witness has been compelled to testify. We affirm the judgment on the opinion of the learned president judge of that court.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Cameron
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 3, 1911
Citation: 229 Pa. 592
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 95
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.