It is very clear that Andrews was not duly equipped according to law; and he was therefore liable to a fine. The evidence before the justice was sufficient to overrule the return of the clerk, which was obtained by a fraud practised upon him by Andrews, who ought to have been convicted. Let the proceedings be quashed.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
