History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Borris
247 Pa. Super. 273
Pa. Super. Ct.
1977
Check Treatment
HOFFMAN, Judge:

The lower court has certified the instant case to this Court on a controlling question of law, see Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, July 81,1970, P.L. 673, No. 223, art. V, § 501; 17 P.S. § 211.501(b): whether the Commonwealth has failed to bring appellant to trial within the period mandated by Rule 1100, Pa.R.Crim.P., 19 P.S. Appendix. We have resolved that issue today in favor of the appellants in Commonwealth v. Mancuso, 247 Pa.Super. 266, 372 A.2d 454 (filed March 31, 1977); see also Commonwealth v. Richey, 247 Pa.Super. 274, 372 A.2d 459 (filed March 31, 1977). The instant case arises out of the same litigation and involves identical facts. Based on our decision in Mancuso, therefore, we order the charges against appellant be dismissed with prejudice. Rule 1100(f).

VAN der VOORT, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Borris
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 31, 1977
Citation: 247 Pa. Super. 273
Docket Number: Appeal No. 648
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.