History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Blood
97 Mass. 538
Mass.
1867
Check Treatment
By the Coükt.

The paper offered as a record was not admissible. There was no proof that the court in California had jurisdiction of the cause and the parties. Although a court of record, its jurisdiction over the subject of divorce is a special authority not recognized by the common law, and its proceedings in relation to it stand on the same footing with those of courts of limited and inferior jurisdiction; so that its powers in the case must be shown and appear to have beén strictly pursued. Exceptions overruled».

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Blood
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1867
Citation: 97 Mass. 538
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.