Commonwealth v. Baynton

| SCOTUS | Sep 1, 1803

4 U.S. 282" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1803-09-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/commonwealth-v-baynton-2620836?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2620836">4 U.S. 282 (____) 4 Dall. 282" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1803-09-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/commonwealth-v-baynton-2620836?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="2620836">4 Dall. 282

The Commonwealth
versus
Baynton et al.

Supreme Court of United States.

M`Kean, (attorney-general) and Dallas for the commonwealth.

Rawle, for the defendants.

The COURT, in the charge, directed the jury, in point of law, to confine the responsibility of the sureties, to a deficit occurring during the year, ensuing the date of the bond. But if, from the evidence, they were satisfied, that there was a deficit, during that year, they thought, that a verdict should be in favour of the commonwealth for the amount.

Verdict for the defendants.^[(1)]

NOTES

[(1)] It may be proper to observe, that Mr. Baynton did not appear, nor take defence, in this suit: the proceedings to recover from him having been instituted on the settlement of the comptroller.