History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Bagdasarian
257 Mass. 248
Mass.
1926
Check Treatment
Wait, J.

The testimony of the officer was properly admitted in evidence. Commonwealth v. Kimball, 7 Gray, 328.

*249If properly admitted upon any ground, the evidence could be used for any purpose, unless its use was expressly limited by the court. Pegg v. Warford, 7 Md. 582. State v. Farmer, 84 Maine, 436, 440. See Higlister v. French, 180 Mass. 299, 301. Hubbard v. Allyn, 200 Mass. 166, 171.

In Commonwealth v. Harwood, 4 Gray, 41, cited by the defendant, the statements excluded were not made upon the premises nor by an inmate. That decision has no application here.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Bagdasarian
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 14, 1926
Citation: 257 Mass. 248
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.