Commonwealth v. Ayala

391 A.2d 673 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1978

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s claim that his offenses should have merged is without merit. However, the judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing on both the aggravated assault and attempt charges; the new sentence is to be imposed in conformance with 18 Pa. C.S. § 1357.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration of decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Ayala

Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date Published: Jul 12, 1978

Citation: 391 A.2d 673

Docket Number: Appeal, No. 789

Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.