History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth ex rel. Romano v. Banmiller
397 Pa. 606
Pa.
1959
Check Treatment

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The relator was tried for a felonious homicide committed in the course of a robbery and was convicted by the jury of murder in the first degree with the penalty fixed at life imprisonment. His motion for a new trial was refused and judgment of sentence was entered on the verdict. On appeal to this court, the judgment of sentence was affirmed (Commonwealth v. Romano, 392 Pa. 632, 141 A. 2d 597), and the relator was duly committed to the Eastern State Penitentiary in Philadelphia, where he is now confined, for the service of his sentence.

On the relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a rule was granted by the court below on July 31, 1959, calling upon the respondent warden to show cause why the writ should not issue. After a hearing on the petition, the rule was discharged and the petition dismissed by the order which the relator has appealed to this court. The opinion of Judge Kelley for the court below, reported in 19 Pa. D. & C. 2d 198, whereon we affirm, amply supports the lower court’s action.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth ex rel. Romano v. Banmiller
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 30, 1959
Citation: 397 Pa. 606
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 355
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.