Opinion by
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which sustained
Appellees operating privileges were originally suspended due to his failure to satisfy a judgment as a result of an automobile accident. Appellee contends that since he had entered into a settlement agreement and he drove his car after this agreement was reached, he should not be held guilty of driving “while privileges were suspended.” The trial court held that appellee was not guilty of driving while under suspension because of this settlement agreement, that the prothonotarys record should have shown this correction, and that one cannot be convicted of driving while privileges are suspended when the period of suspension has expired.
Driving upon the highways is a privilege and not a right. When that privilege has been suspended, it is not automatically restored by the performance of some mandatory act. The operator must himself take affirmative steps to have his privilege to drive reinstated. He cannot be permitted to drive until the Department of Transportation has taken some affirmative action to restore his privilege. Nor can he offer such testimony as the settlement agreement as a defense. There is nothing in the evidence to show a reinstatement by the Department of Transportation and that was Happe’s burden. Commonwealth v. Moyer, 225 Pa. Superior Ct. 374, 310 A.2d 345 (1973).
Accordingly, we reverse.
Order
Now, December 9, 1987, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, in No. S. A. 1431 of 1985, dated January 30, 1986, is reversed.