10979 | 6th Cir. | Feb 12, 1952

194 F.2d 536" date_filed="1952-02-12" court="6th Cir." case_name="Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Hall C. Smith">194 F.2d 536

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,
v.
Hall C. SMITH, Respondent.

No. 10979.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

February 12, 1952.

Petition for Review of a Decision of the Tax Court.

Theron L. Caudle, Charles Oliphant, John M. Morawski, Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott and Graham Loving, Jr., all of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Sol Goodman, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

2

And it appearing that the Tax Court of the United States, in a prior proceeding, held the respondent liable in equity as a transferee for unpaid taxes of a corporation, and that the decision of the Tax Court, 11 T.C. 174" date_filed="1948-08-16" court="Tax Ct." case_name="Smith v. Commissioner">11 T.C. 174, was affirmed by this court in Charles E. Smith & Sons Co. v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 184 F.2d 1011" date_filed="1950-10-20" court="6th Cir." case_name="Charles E. Smith & Sons Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue">184 F.2d 1011, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 953" date_filed="1951-03-26" court="SCOTUS" case_name="R. H. Oswald Co. v. Commissioner">340 U.S. 953, 954, 71 S. Ct. 572" date_filed="1951-03-26" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Minkoff v. United States">71 S. Ct. 572, 95 L. Ed. 687" date_filed="1951-03-26" court="SCOTUS" case_name="R. H. Oswald Co. v. Commissioner">95 L. Ed. 687.

3

And it appearing that the receipt of the excessive salary to the extent of which the respondent was held liable as transferee constituted "the bare receipt of property or money wholly belonging to another", Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilcox, 327 U.S. 404, 66 S. Ct. 546, 549, 90 L. Ed. 752, and that the respondent held the funds not for himself but for the creditors of the transferor;

4

It is ordered that the decision of the Tax Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.