Commercial National Bank v. DeppenCommercial National Bank v. Deppen
Appellants, in their sole proposition of law, assert, in essence, that the granting of appellee’s motion for summary judgment was not a final appealable order, because the journal entry did not contain an express determination concerning the finality of judgment for the parties, to wit: The language in
We find appellants’ assertion to be without merit.
“When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may enter final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay. * * * ” (Emphasis added.)
Therefore, appellants’ notice of appeal of June 12, 1979, was not timely filed. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.