Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Southern Surety Co.

111 N.J. Eq. 356 | N.J. | 1932

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes, and printed in 9 N. J. Mis. R. 687.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenohaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Van Buskiek, Kays, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — Hone.

midpage