History
  • No items yet
midpage
120 A.3d 1047
Pa. Super. Ct.
2015

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RAYMOND CHARLES WHITE

No. 655 WDA 2014

In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania

March 05, 2015

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

BEFORE: DONOHUE, MUNDY, and FITZGERALD,* JJ.

Appeal from the PCRA Order February 24, 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County
Criminal Division No(s).: CP-02-CR-0013548-2000

MEMORANDUM BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED MARCH 05, 2015

This matter returns to us after this panel, on January 7, 2015,1 remanded to determine the status of appointed counsel, Patrick K. Nightingale, Esq., in light of the petition to withdraw from representation he filed in the PCRA court pursuant to Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988), and Commonwealth v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988) (en banc). The PCRA court has supplemented the record with an order dated and entered January 20, 2015, stating Attorney Nightingales’ petition to withdraw “is hereby GRANTED.” Order 1/20/15.

We note this is the third time this Court has addressed the matter of appointed counsel‘s status with respect to Appellant‘s second petition filed under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. See id.; Commonwealth v. White, 910 WDA 2012 (unpublished memorandum at 2) (Pa. Super. Jan. 28, 2013). However, the PCRA court‘s January 20, 2015 order was entered after Appellant perfected the underlying appeal and while this Court retained jurisdiction for the determination of Attorney Nightingale‘s status in the appeal. See White, 655 WDA 2014 at 7-8. Moreover, there is no indication in the supplemental record that Attorney Nightingale was granted leave to withdraw before this appeal. Accordingly, we consider the January 20, 2015 order to be a nullity and strike it as such.

Because Attorney Nightingale was not properly permitted to withdraw, we remand for a Grazier hearing, which shall be held within thirty days of this memorandum. If Appellant elects to proceed pro se in this appeal, the PCRA court shall supplement the record with its colloquy and Appellant‘s waiver of the assistance of counsel. If Appellant elects to proceed with counsel, Attorney Nightingale shall, within sixty days of Appellant‘s decision, file an advocate‘s brief or seek withdrawal in this Court by filing a petition to withdraw and an accompanying Turner/Finley no-merit letter addressing whether Appellant‘s instant second petition was timely filed and any issues Appellant intends to raise on appeal.2

Case remanded. Order of January 20, 2015, stricken. Panel jurisdiction retained.

Notes

1
Commonwealth v. White, 655 WDA 2014 (unpublished memorandum at 7) (Pa. Super. Jan. 7, 2015).
2
The Commonwealth may file an amended or supplemental brief if Attorney Nightingale proceeds as counsel in this appeal.
*
* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. White, R.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 5, 2015
Citations: 120 A.3d 1047; 655 WDA 2014
Docket Number: 655 WDA 2014
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In