12 Ga. App. 674 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1913
The plaintiff recovered a verdict for an injury to his automobile, resulting from a collision with a street-car- of the defendant, and the defendant excepts to the overruling of its motion for a new trial.
Under the evidence in this case, the jury should have been instructed that the ordinance was a valid and reasonable one, and that, if the collision occurred on the bridge or an approach thereto, the plaintiff would be guilty of negligence as a matter of law, if he was propelling his machine at a greater rate of speed than
Judgment reversed.