Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a final judgment. Haseltine v. Central National Bank, 183 U.S. 130" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1901-12-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/haseltine-v-central-bank-of-springfield-95535?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="95535">183 U.S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U.S. 173" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1905-05-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/schlosser-v-hemphill-96289?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96289">198 U.S. 173, 175, 176; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Comm’n, 226 *652U.S. 99, 101, 102; Gulf Refining Co. v. United States, 269 U.S. 125" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1925-11-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/gulf-refining-co-of-la-v-norvell-100727?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="100727">269 U.S. 125, 135, 136; Georgia Ry. Co. v. Decatur, 262 U.S. 432" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1923-06-11" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/georgia-railway--power-co-v-town-of-decatur-100237?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="100237">262 U.S. 432, 437; Hinderlider v. LaPlata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co., ante, p. 650.
Mr. Edward C. Turner, with whom Mr. Albert M. Calland was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. John L. Davies and James W. Huffman for appellees.