130 F. 152 | U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia | 1903
This cause came on to be heard upon the report of W. A. Wimbish, master in chancery, filed herein on April 37, 1903, and upon the exceptions filed by the defendant the city of Dawson to the report of said master, and upon the motion of
First. That the exceptions to said report be, and the same are, all and severally, overruled.
Second. Whereupon It is ordered, adjudged, considered, and decreed that said report of said master in chancery, W. A. Wimbish, Esq., be, and the same is, in all respects, confirmed, and it is ordered that a decree in favor of the said complainant against the defendants, in accordance with the findings made by said master in said report, be made and entered herein.
Third. In accordance with the findings made by the said master in said report, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed by the court that the contract entered into between the city of Dawson and the Dawson Waterworks Company, which constitutes the subject-matter of this suit, and a copy of which is annexed to the complainant’s bill of complaint, marked “Exhibit B,” and by reference made a part of said bill of complaint, is, and it is hereby declared and decreed to be, valid, binding, and enforceable, and that the ordinances, action, and conduct of the city of Dawson, the mayor and council and other officers of said city, whereby it is sought to invalidate the said contract, are unconstitutional and void, as seeking to impair the obligation of said contract. And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that a perpetual injunction be granted to complainant, prohibiting, restraining, and forbidding the city of Dawson, the mayor and aldermen of the said city of Dawson, and the other officers and agents, and their confederates and abettors, from negotiating, selling, or disposing of any of the bonds of the city of Dawson mentioned in complainant’s said bill of complaint, authorized by the said city of Dawson to be used in the construction of a system of waterworks by the said city of Dawson, and from constructing, maintaining, or operating any system of waterworks in the city of Dawson for the purpose of supplying either the said city of Dawson or its inhabitants with water for fire protection or domestic use, or from entering into any contract or arrangement with any person, firm, or corporation for the construction, lease, operation, or use of any system of waterworks, or any supply of water for fire protection or other municipal purpose, or from laying mains or pipes, or permitting the laying of pipes or mains, for the construction of waterworks, or from paying out any moneys for waterworks, or from incurring any obligation for waterworks, or from entering into or carrying out any contract for waterworks, save and except the contract referred to in complainant’s bill of complaint, or from forbidding or preventing any person, organization, fire company, or agency from carrying out said contract with the Dawson Waterworks Company, or from placing any obstacle in the way of the due carrying out of the provisions and specifications thereof according to its terms, for and during the term of the aforesaid contract, and while said contract shall remain in force.
Fourth. And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed by the
Notice having been given of an appeal in this case, a stay of 60 days from date is allowed.