Coltinuk v. Hockstein

Jan 19, 1925
Versions:127 A. 924
12 Stock. 371
97 N.J. Eq. 371
1925 N.J. LEXIS 538
Per Curiam.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed to compel specific performance of a contract to convey real estate, located in the city of Bayonne.

Our reading of the record and a consideration of the briefs lead us to the same conclusion as that of the vice-chancellor, viz., a decree for specific performance should be ordered.

The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 8. For reversal—Parker, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Kays, JJ. 6.