20 Misc. 410 | City of New York Municipal Court | 1897
This is an appeal from a judgment entered by direction of the court, and from an order denying a motion for, a new trial. .'
The lexi loci contractus determines the validity of the contract and the rights of the parties thereto.
The testimony as to the Laws of the State of Tennessee is to the effect that a guaranty in cases of the character in suit is supported by the original consideration between the original parties, where the two instruments are executed concurrently and the guaranty refers to the note guaranteed.
The note in question was dated, at Chattanooga, ■ Eebruary 19, 1891, and expressed a consideration on its face.
The defendant’s guaranty is also dated February 19, 1891, at Chattanooga, and referred to two notes (one being the note in suit) as having been made on that date. »
This brings the case squarely within the laws of the State of Tennessee.
As appears by the undisputed evidence, the two instruments were executed at the same place on the same day and' refer to each other, and for the purpose of the action must be held.to have been executed concurrently.
This disposes of the plaintiff’s right ti> recover, and as the record discloses no error committed ■ on the trial, the judgment must be affirmed.
O’Dwyer and Scotchman, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.