1 Colo. App. 152 | Colo. Ct. App. | 1891
The injury complained of was occasioned
The only error available is that predicated upon the ruling of the court on the demurrer to the complaint. It would not be advantageous to the profession to set out the complaint in extenso, to show its insufficiency, or to confirm the adequacy of the reasons assigned for the overruling of the action of the court. It is enough to say that in two particulars the complaint was radically defective. It is the law of this state, that a lot owner can only recover for those damages which he has sustained from the construction or operation of a road subsequent to the time when he acquired his title to the property. If the road has been constructed and is in operation at the time he gets title, he is supposed to have taken it cum onere, and to have paid the lesser price because of the disadvantages. The damages arising from the construction
Tor the error committed in overruling the demurrer, the cause must’ be reversed and remanded to the court below for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.
Reversed.