Colman v. Graeter
1 Blackf. 388
Ind.
1825
Check Treatment

DEBT against three persons. The writ was served on two on]y? and returned as to the other “non est inventus.” Held, that this return*, with a suggestion of it on the record, authorizes the plaintiff, in such suit, to proceed against those on whom the process is served; Stat. 1823, p. 290; but that a return of “no inhabitant” was formerly required in such cases. Morris v. Knight, ante, p. 106. — Palmer v. Crosby, ante, p. 139.