midpage

Collins v. StateCollins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 28, 1990
No. 89-3130
Versions:571 So. 2d 583
1990 WL 211733
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9818
PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a corrected sentence as a habitual offender. We reject appellant’s arguments that the habitual offender statute is unconstitutional. See Pittman v. State, 570 So.2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA), cause dismissed, 564 So.2d 488 (Fla.1990). We also disagree with appellant’s contention as to a lack of clarity in the correction and conclude that the corrected sentence eliminated the three-year minimum. Accordingly, we affirm.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Collins v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 28, 1990
Citations: 571 So. 2d 583; 1990 WL 211733; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9818; No. 89-3130
Docket Number: No. 89-3130
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In