History
  • No items yet
midpage
Collection Corp. v. Anami
34 Haw. 241
| Haw. | 1937
|
Check Treatment

This is a motion for a rehearing. The burden of the movants' complaint is that this court failed to consider a vital question of law that was involved in the case. This is not factually true. The question referred to was fully argued both orally and in the briefs of counsel and was duly considered. We know of no reason why it should be reconsidered. The other grounds of the motion are also without merit.

Motion is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Collection Corp. v. Anami
Court Name: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 1, 1937
Citation: 34 Haw. 241
Docket Number: No. 2290.
Court Abbreviation: Haw.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.