41 Ga. App. 620 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1930
1. The excerpt from the charge of the court, complained of in the motioxx for 'a new trial, was not error for any reasoxx assigned.
2. “The State, by proving the corpxxs delicti, the vemxe, and the recexxt possession of the stolen property, axxd its sale by the defendant, made a prima facie case. Whether the defendaxxt’s explanation of his possession of the property was consistent with his innoeexxce and satisfactox-y
Judgment affirmed.