History
  • No items yet
midpage
Coley v. Smith
162 S.E.2d 216
Ga. Ct. App.
1968
Check Treatment
Pannell, Judge.

The appellant, in his brief, has failed completely to comply with Rules 17 (a) (1) and 17 (c) (3) (A), which were effective August 1, 1965. III Ga. App. 883, 890. Accordingly the enumeration of errors not being supported by references to the record as therein provided will be considered as abandoned, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed. See Strickland v. English, 115 Ga. App. 384 (2) (154 SE2d 710).

Judgment affirmed.

Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur. *823 C. C. Crockett, A. L. Hatcher, for appellants. Milton Harrison, for appellees.

Case Details

Case Name: Coley v. Smith
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 17, 1968
Citation: 162 S.E.2d 216
Docket Number: 43619
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.