History
  • No items yet
midpage
Coleman v. State
563 S.W.3d 180
Mo. Ct. App.
2018
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Demetry Coleman appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order ("Judgment") denying his Rule 24.035 motion, which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Coleman v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 11, 2018
Citation: 563 S.W.3d 180
Docket Number: No. ED 106409
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.