Coleman v. StateColeman v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Luke
While the evidence, which is entirely circumstantial, raises a grave suspicion of the defendant’s guilt, it does not exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that of his guilt; and for this reason alone the judgment overruling his motion for a new trial is reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Broyles, O. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., dissents.Long v. State, 5 Ga. App. 176; Mathis v. State, 30 Ga. App. 10; 32 Ga. App. 542; Weems v. State, 84 Ga. 461.