186 A. 14 | N.H. | 1936
Where a written instrument contains a clause reciting the object or intention of the parties, such clause is obviously designed to prevail over contradictory or ambiguous statements elsewhere in the document. Woods v. Company,
It should be noted that this is not a case where an unforeseen situation has arisen since the execution of the contract. Tenants were occupying a part of the premises at the time the contract was entered into, and it is significant that while the recital of intention expressly excludes "other property," no reference to the tenants is there made.
In accordance with the stipulation of the parties, the order is
Judgment for the defendants.