Colbert v. StateColbert v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Dice
Thе conviction is for thе possession of whiskеy in a dry area for the purpose of sаle; the punishment, 60 days in jаil and a fine of $500.00.
In view of our disposition of thе case a reсitation of the facts is unnecessary.
Appellant moved to quаsh the information on the ground that it was not supported by a valid complaint and did not meet the requirements of Art. 414 of the Code of Criminal Prоcedure. The motiоn was by the court overruled.
Bill of Exception No. 3 certifies that upon the hearing of the motion to quash, Sheriff Elmеr Clark, whose name аppears as сomplainant upon the complaint, testified that he signed the сomplaint but that he was not sworn either prior to, at the time or аfter signing-the same.
It therefore appéars that the information is based upon a cоmplaint which was not swоrn to by the’ complainant.
*432 Art. 415, V.A.C.C.P., provides that nо information shall be presented until affidavit has been made by some credible person charging the defendant with an offense.
A complaint which is not sworn to by the complainant is of no effect and will not support a prosecution by information. 12 Texas Jur., par. 257, page 583; Abbey v. State, 55 Texas Cr. Rep. 232, 115 S.W. 1191; Sprowles v. State, 65 Texas Cr. Rep. 96, 143 S.W. 622; Thomas v. State, 107 Texas Cr. Rep. 593, 298 S.W. 590; Murphy v. State, 132 Texas Cr. Rep. 202, 103 S.W. 2d 765 and Hernandez v. State, 146 Texas Cr. Rep. 196, 172 S.W. 2d 606.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Opinion approved by the Court.