History
  • No items yet
midpage
Coker v. State
25 Ala. App. 191
Ala. Ct. App.
1932
Check Treatment

The only evidence for the state was that of the sheriff and his deputy, who testified that, armed with a search warrant they went to defendant's place and found one pint of whisky under the back steps to his store and eleven pints in the furnace of a barbecue pit in the rear of the storehouse.

There was no evidence as to the ownership of the whisky, and nothing to prove that defendant knew of its presence. The cause was tried by the court, without a jury. As has many times been pointed out, a constructive possession alone is not sufficient to justify a conviction. Burroughs v. State, 24 Ala. App. 579,139 So. 115; Eldridge v. State, 24 Ala. App. 395, 135 So. 646.

The trial court erred in rendering judgment of conviction. *Page 192

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Coker v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 30, 1932
Citation: 25 Ala. App. 191
Docket Number: 7 Div. 905.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.