History
  • No items yet
midpage
Coit v. Geer
1 Kirby 269
Conn. Super. Ct.
1787
Check Treatment
By the whole Court.

The appeal is not sustainable.— No one is to be twice drawn in jeopardy for the same crime, which might be the case if this appeal is sustained. The complainant might have sued only for his damages, and had an appeal; but having elected to unite his demand for damages with a criminal prosecution, on which one acquittal is final, ho has waived his right of appeal.

Case Details

Case Name: Coit v. Geer
Court Name: Connecticut Superior Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1787
Citation: 1 Kirby 269
Court Abbreviation: Conn. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.