History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cohen v. Beall
68 S.E. 1118
Ga.
1910
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This ease came before this court upon, a writ of error; and the same being for decision by a full bench of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Justices Lumpkin, Beck, and Holden being in favor of a reversal, and Chief Justice Eish, Presiding Justice Evans, and Justice Atkinson being- in favor of an affirmative, it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court below stand affirmed by ' operation of law.

Case Details

Case Name: Cohen v. Beall
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 23, 1910
Citation: 68 S.E. 1118
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.