We agree with the appellant/wife’s contention that the trial court erred in receiving ex parte evidence affecting her duties as a custodial parent. We, therefore, strike paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order since there is no competent evidence to support them. See In the Interest of Brown, 246 So.2d 166 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).
The order in all other respects is affirmed as modified.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
