History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cogdell v. . Barfield
9 N.C. 332
N.C.
1823
Check Treatment

The affidavits show that there is no ground on which the Court would grant a new trial. The defendant Barfield neglected the case from the beginning, on very insufficient reasons, whereby a default was taken against him, and afterwards on the trial incurred the risk of a counsel's attendance who did not practice in the court, while he was told of others that would be in attendance. To award a new trial for the reasons here offered were to encourage inattention and promote litigation.

PER CURIAM. No error.

Case Details

Case Name: Cogdell v. . Barfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1823
Citation: 9 N.C. 332
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.