History
  • No items yet
midpage
Codwise v. Gleason
3 Day 12
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1808
Check Treatment
Livingston, J.

directed the jury, that as to the first point, though he had had doubts, they were almost entirely removed. If anote were forged, the endorsement would bind the man who made it .

*16The second point he declared not to have altered the decision of the case from what it would havebeen, if the were the only endorsees^ and the defendants the only persons through whose hands the note had passed, Gleason 1st Cowles gave the weight of their names to the world, and must be responsible to every man who trusts to the note relying on their credit, as every subsequent endorsee must be supposed to do, from the nature of the transaction. The case is, therefore, clearly frith the plaintiffs on both points. .

A verdict was accordingly found for plaintiffs to recover 1,599 dollars and 20 cents damages.

Case Details

Case Name: Codwise v. Gleason
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
Date Published: Apr 15, 1808
Citation: 3 Day 12
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.