560 So. 2d 269 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1990
The principal issue in the instant appeal is the correctness of the trial court’s computation of the Landay
As we compute it, after equal allocation of the mortgage indebtedness on the new residence, the wife’s share of the new residence totaled $7,155.25, rather than the figure of $4,729.25 arrived at by the trial court, which amount was ordered to be paid to the wife.
Other than correcting this computational error, we affirm the lower court’s judgment. An additional amount of $2,426.00 should be paid by the husband to the wife for the value of her share of the residence.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.
. Landay v. Landay, 429 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1983).