History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cobb v. State
35 S.E. 178
Ga.
1900
Check Treatment
Fish, J.

1. Irrespective of the counter-showing made by the State, the motion of the accused for a continuance, upon the ground of absent witnesses, was insufficient, in that it was not shown that the application was not made for the purpose of delay. Penal Code, § 962; Newsome v. State, 61 Ga. 481; Boggess v. Lowrey, 78 Ga. 353; Burnett v. State, 87 Ga. 622; Johnson v. State, 95 Ga. 499; Tomlin v. State, ante.

2. The evidence warranted the verdict and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Cobb v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 27, 1900
Citation: 35 S.E. 178
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.