Cobb v. State, 90-1683

90-1683 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Oct 8, 1990

567 So. 2d 554" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1990-10-08" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/cobb-v-state-1805457?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1805457">567 So. 2d 554 (1990)

Sarah Jane COBB, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 90-1683.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 8, 1990.

David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Huff v. State, 566 So. 2d 945" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="1990-09-21" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/huff-v-state-1152410?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1152410">566 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1990); Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR SECTION 921.087, FLORIDA STATUTES.

SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.