History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cobb v. Hogue
87 Ga. 450
Ga.
1891
Check Treatment

Judgment, affirmed.

The plaintiffs brought their petition against Hogue, Jackson and Daniel, for injunction to restrai 'die clos*451ing of an alleged road or street, alleging that said defendants had no title thereto, and were insolvent. Hogue answered that the action he had taken in the matter was as agent for Mrs. Demley, who claimed perfect title to the property; and that she was not insolvent. Numerous other allegations, not necessary to bo here stated, were made in the petition and answer, and the evidence introduced in their support was conflicting. At the hearing the plaintiffs moved for an iniunction against Jackson and Daniel, they having made no appearance nor filed any answer; which motion was denied. They then moved to strike Hogue’s answer because it purported to be an answer as agent for Mrs. Demley, she not being a party to the petition. This motion also was overruled.

Simmons & Kimbrough and Hudson & Blalock, by brief, for plaintiffs. Hinton, Cutts & Tyson, for defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Cobb v. Hogue
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 8, 1891
Citation: 87 Ga. 450
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.