midpage

Coats v. StateCoats v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 12, 1919
No. 5550.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Morrow
MORROW, Judge.

—The appellant is charged with the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquors. He ‍‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‍entered a plea of guilty, and was assessed the lowest penalty. Under these circumstances he is not in position to urge as a ground for ‍‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‍reversal the insufficiency of the evidence to prove his guilt. Doane v. State, 36 Texas Crim. App., 468; Shelton v. State, 30 Texas, 431; Woodall v. ‍‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‍State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep., 513, 126 S. W. Rep., 592; Josef v. State, 26 S. W. Rep., 213. If we were to look to the evidence, ‍‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‍however, it is sufficient to sustain the verdict. He admitted that he made whisky, and further proof was not required to show that the liquor ‍‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‍was intoxicating. Rutherford v. State, 49 Texas Crim. App., 21.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirm,ed*

Case Details

Case Name: Coats v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 12, 1919
Citations: 215 S.W. 856; 86 Tex. Crim. 234; 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 387; No. 5550.
Docket Number: No. 5550.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
Log In