History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clow v. Borst
6 Johns. 37
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1810
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In the case of Grimes v. Bolfield, (Cro. Eliz. 541.) and which is cited as law, by Baron Comyns, (tit. Accord, A. 2.) it was held not to be a good plea of accord and satisfaction to a bond, that a stranger had surrendered a tenement to a plaintiff, in satisfaction of the debt, which he accepted; because the stranger was not privy to the bond; and a satisfaction given by him was not good. If this case be an authority, and it does not appear ever to have been questioned, the plea in the present case is bad, and judgment must be given for the plaintiff.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Case Details

Case Name: Clow v. Borst
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1810
Citation: 6 Johns. 37
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.