Cloud v. PattersonCloud v. Patterson
Jan 15, 1828
- Reporters:
- Before:
- White
By JUDGE WHITE.
Note. See Minor’s Ala. Rep. 410, 71, 257Í 270v
Shortridge and Ellis, for the plaintiff.
Parsons, for defendant.
Judge Saeeold not sitting.
The question is, whether the Court erred in the opinion given on the trial as stated ? We think not. There ivas written, and therefore, superior evidence of the contract of sale admitted to exist, than that offered by the defen*395dant below. Hence it was right to exclude the latter, until the nonproduction of the former was accounted for in a way recognized by law. Let the judgement be affirmed. ■