Clisby v. State, 456 So. 2d 98

AFTER REMANDMENT

BOWEN, Judge.

In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Clisby v. State, 456 So.2d 95 (Ala.1983), this cause is remanded for the trial court’s reconsideration of its handling of Dr. Estock’s report in view of the holdings of Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 1866, 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), and Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir.1982).

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Appeal after remand, Ala.Cr.App., 456 So.2d 99.

DeCARLO, P.J., and TYSON and HARRIS. JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Clisby v. State

Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date Published: Mar 29, 1983

Citations: 456 So. 2d 98; 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4219; 6 Div. 576

Docket Number: 6 Div. 576

Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.