History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clisby v. State
456 So. 2d 98
Ala. Crim. App.
1983
Check Treatment

AFTER REMANDMENT

In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Clisby v. *Page 99 State, 456 So.2d 95 (Ala. 1983), this cause is remanded for the trial court's reconsideration of its handling of Dr. Estock's report in view of the holdings of Estelle v. Smith,451 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 1866, 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), and Proffitt v.Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir. 1982).

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Appeal after remand, Ala.Cr.App., 456 So.2d 99.

DeCARLO, P.J., and TYSON and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Clisby v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Mar 29, 1983
Citation: 456 So. 2d 98
Docket Number: 6 Div. 576
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.