History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cline v. . Lemon
4 N.C. 323
| N.C. | 1816
|
Check Treatment

If the evidence offered by defendant was improperly rejected by the court, then a new trial to be granted; if properly rejected, judgment for plaintiff. No principle of law in relation to evidence is better settled than that parol testimony in contradiction of matters of (324) record is inadmissible. The testimony offered by defendant was in contradiction of the records of the county court of Lincoln, confirming the report of the jury and the road laid out by them. Such testimony was properly rejected by the presiding judge.

Motion for new trial overruled.

Judgment for plaintiff.

Case Details

Case Name: Cline v. . Lemon
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 5, 1816
Citation: 4 N.C. 323
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.