14 Ky. 215 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1823
S' *OS 5->¶] o-‘s -3- '? 'o eL §£? .3??' _0;NT> O' O' ■ P> m , ® Cfi ^ A, 3*S 2L ^ S ® §' »•» i a^1 O O ^ £•«»-§ Í 3 1 s.££ No ° 3 »a = if ^¡1^.5™ 3 ST 5‘# 2 SfiSSralsr-.iHa. p n B j? P* *E ^OQ ?r o /-+. »-5 Cu"- co w _„, mmmms&Zte * CJ O ' 2 rn2Si? R o-di^o ¿ o cl-S ’S3 >§ 9 ^cr - - o O, ^ CD I 2 o <w ^ o- g; -*., £ ^ ¿ x-o ¡3. rfj O' g-^K «¿'•acre! r-.-s dfg. g H.N' |? !T Ct> c/j.rj O,-*-- ¿*&emdash;■ pa o r p a»1". o pa o' S:£- EL'ri. «Í , • ~'EU CD rv. x. CD \ Q cnJ%J . 5 ® á Off-feB. ® í W C3 2-W'OrC if 3 CD £4 ®g^cd£>o a-.^Ssst ®; w - “ S?^? 3. 5 p B: S' C3- ^ w fed.* ® 05 K-3*"^ Wo-i d-í^íw. P Í--., C® c-i- 1 ¿?3 5- , p 'P 3“ P &■• ^3 £ 3- K- m £ 70 r-i- ® O ¿tf®'® 2 < ^ & “>' 3 ga »■'» tt> ro 03 <t> g o * B -. f+ . s D w 3 r= =• a*8 g 2 §- Í5-i?g 3 ? ? 2#P ^5 ^ fD ££'. k 3 ^ S1'^ P3 íC . * a- ^ p £,: sr » c- CD “ O «-> •S. a .SIS''-g o a 3a) a -a ■ ^ o o <u «•»-. Q & P cS « r~j O-i CLP '+~l Cu <i> 0> ^ rd , *“J *~S 0-3 V CD o 3 P ST3 O P ira , á* pfe £ 02 < p^o tr O < Ri->a«£> » g » _ &emdash; | V!- 3 ^ 3 - t_.. p^“ o » 2 «. . »gí,í f< B,< rt- CD P p> P O in S. n> *-P 'to ££*§- • . p C'-CTQ |>X5 P ■ g’ s’ s-T-S^a S3»-5 -3-“ g g o. Cía O-. £7* O -¡sf^r CL,MW^-cr g* n g; cr O ci* -it)-’ ri- . Li®i ■hwq. P> O *-V D ’^i -, g *3 ^ - - g?v ^ ¿ ^ ¡ai & gi sr-o-S’^® Ó P p ' g' Ef. ® £-1^ 5 •e 8S S § s. «g S s « 3 o ft» g t-. &emdash;«h -2» o.g-B a. 2. c±^ o £r Cb o S--»T3 CCdEr1 P.^ A " £ P S ?r&£ • ,B g 2.2. ■ rg • cr o c3 3 2S S'-^'5!;g ¡ •d‘ M fg%. ,, p iCj s g .gátc. P i p 5? 3 s gpí*.tí2 ^..1. rJ~J~M
ises. After Mif qyipof pfLf,j|fe foregoing TacYáff;lffé counsel foir ‘ClifuT Íhé^ppí®ral,' moved the court ‘to f^iruct the jjdSy, '1st,' thai’-^ter (he purchase made the ;tlifee patters, at the' sheriff's sale,'the purdfr^sers becafÜe entitled*» to the annual rents ¡of the prejelses accru1dfe unde» the lease from Barnes^to Saundefs: 2d, thafjnie plaintiíj' below ought not to' recover more fft this suit, than*he would iih equity and.good conscience bh entUled to, as a tenant in cowipon,'after allowing the ora'fendant so muen as in jus&cétand good con-he yBoiil'dlbe entitled to for the five years whicl^ premis
f if' rnnrf- oítvfiTnA firsr. The court g*tve|Be first, b^t refused the second of these mslruciions. The appellant excepted, and ás-sjwns tfp[ refusal as error.
.We concur with the court below m supposaop as p do^ie in the first instruction, that the lease for t^jmars, ulji-ccordcd, %as not good against the execution forfive Fdr our act of assembly, (1 Litt. 565,)$.in its ^first section, makes every afgtecorded deedufty^a !<#!- g@r ¿¿'Aft (ban five years, inv||p! again!};' any^SjediWr. ® course, as the lease was for a longer term, HIjkis invalid, and we do not suppose that it i$, good 'for part of the term, and bad for the residue, fÉghe gestión is, -Q gu ^ case js (be term no* longer than five years? ,.,I¿ it is, no part oí it is valid against the execution. But weqjMfer from that court in supposing that the j^jirxha-Entitled to tfte annual rents of the premises ífn'&e?. the lease from Barnes to SaunderS, or tlie rent fixed by that lease, formed any criterion of Tept to bp fixed on the premises tefter“'the sale, if we juppose feunders's^yi'lo have held the lease and the j>bifs;ession at the timé! of the sale, institad^of Siodcdon, he would not by the sale have became the'tenanj of the pnirchasiSrs, or been bound to account to them for the rents at thatjprice. His lease, as to them,.^vóuld have ,J>een v.oid, a® he would ha'ys* been bound ,tb surrender the ppssessiofí'." ’Tf id^del^dv^.uf^unot hav$ operated in bis favor, to Sid frumps againshthe purchasers, tgre-tayi the possession, so, on the principles oifreciprocity, he could not*be~J>puad to them by it. Such then was
*■»' P P p P ° 3^3 tr 5K p >*cs P* o 53 3 3 CD ,.P 3 2 p-cn vs v'w'af* > o’^ ^JQ sr r5 *r»TJ $5 ? (Í -I . L¿ Ol w w. 2 J#-5*: 53 g - o S ,-fS.ra) o cr ¡L a ^ -: ¿5 H2 - co cd ’ ¡£4£ 3 D o' CW, -f oSgin ’r" *"' i--2| CD CD / fQ . P !?cra s ft;1^ ? ■ ?3o5s ^ p 3 O — ^ O O tí ^ 2 rf O r c n * i. ft.CK! - ^,.. ~ ” ® r„ g "1 D' ? I *”*■ y-j J5® >-j CD fD c-+• o^S,2g|f3'|^ 3 . "" 5. 2 <^'-c p C 03 o« Kg/Sfi'lg'
The judgment must, therefore, be reversed, and the, verdict be set aside with costs, and the cause must be" remanded for new proceedings, not inconsistent with the principles of this opinion.